
Visual search is typically guided by goals that are set within working memory. By varying the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between a visual stimulus describing the target and the search display containing that target, previous studies have estimated how long it takes to implement such an attentional set. Here we investigate how long it takes to turn a visual memory representation (rather than a percept of the stimulus) into an attentional set. We used a memory-based postcueing procedure in which observers first encoded two colors into memory. A subsequent spatial cue indicated which of the two defined the relevant target color, followed by the search task. Experiment 1, which employed RT-based measures with unlimited viewing time, showed search slopes for relevant and irrelevant sets that suggested near instant guidance. However, Experiment 2 demonstrated that RT measures can suffer from severe underestimation. With temporally limited (and masked) viewing, accuracy scores showed that maximal search guidance was reached at about 400 ms. The results suggest that a visual memory can be turned into an attentional set within less than half a second. The implications for previous findings are discussed.
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Young Adult, Memory, Short-Term, Reaction Time, Humans, Attention, Female, Cues, Color Perception, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Young Adult, Memory, Short-Term, Reaction Time, Humans, Attention, Female, Cues, Color Perception, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
