
doi: 10.1162/rest_a_01152
Abstract We study how news coverage of immigrant criminality impacts voting in one of the most controversial referendums in recent years—the 2009 Swiss minaret ban. We combine a comprehensive crime detection data set with detailed information on newspaper coverage. We first document a large upward distortion in media reporting of immigrant crime during the prereferendum period. Exploiting quasi-random variations in crime incidence, we find a positive first-order effect of news coverage on support for the ban. Our quantification shows that, in absence of the media bias, the pro-ban vote would have decreased from 57.6% to 53.5% at the national level.
SDG 16 - Peace, media, HBE, Gerechtigkeit und starke Institutionen, 502021 Microeconomics, Justice and Strong Institutions, Cat1, SDG 16 – Frieden, 502021 Mikroökonomie, violent crime, immigration
SDG 16 - Peace, media, HBE, Gerechtigkeit und starke Institutionen, 502021 Microeconomics, Justice and Strong Institutions, Cat1, SDG 16 – Frieden, 502021 Mikroökonomie, violent crime, immigration
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
