
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>AbstractAlthough economists have long been aware of Jensen's inequality, many econometric applications have neglected an important implication of it: under heteroskedasticity, the parameters of log-linearized models estimated by OLS lead to biased estimates of the true elasticities. We explain why this problem arises and propose an appropriate estimator. Our criticism of conventional practices and the proposed solution extend to a broad range of applications where log-linearized equations are estimated. We develop the argument using one particular illustration, the gravity equation for trade. We find significant differences between estimates obtained with the proposed estimator and those obtained with the traditional method.
HB Economic Theory, 330, elasticities; gravity equation; heteroskedasticity; Jensen's inequality; poisson regression, Elasticities, Gravity equation, Heteroskedasticity, Jensens inequality, Poisson regression, Preferential-trade agreements, Elasticities; Gravity equation; Heteroskedasticity; Jensen's inequality; Poisson regression; Preferential-trade agreements, jel: jel:F15, jel: jel:C13, jel: jel:F10, jel: jel:C21, jel: jel:F11, jel: jel:F12
HB Economic Theory, 330, elasticities; gravity equation; heteroskedasticity; Jensen's inequality; poisson regression, Elasticities, Gravity equation, Heteroskedasticity, Jensens inequality, Poisson regression, Preferential-trade agreements, Elasticities; Gravity equation; Heteroskedasticity; Jensen's inequality; Poisson regression; Preferential-trade agreements, jel: jel:F15, jel: jel:C13, jel: jel:F10, jel: jel:C21, jel: jel:F11, jel: jel:F12
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5K | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.01% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.01% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
