
doi: 10.1162/ijlm_a_00092
In this article we discuss why media literacies are being acknowledged as a key competence across a range of life functions and policy domains, and we propose that, in order to understand and help develop these literacies, researchers from media studies and education studies need to identify common theoretical and empirical grounds and systematically harness synergies where they may be found. As an inroad to such a process of identification, the article explores key trajectories within the two fields since the 1980s by considering the intensified interest in the people who are at the core of the activities under study (learners, audiences), their practices of meaning-making, and the scientific approaches employed. We argue that the trajectories toward studying meaning-making across contexts that have developed largely without interaction between the two fields of study now need to be acknowledged and aligned in order to strengthen the research base from which media literacies may be advanced. We present r...
uddannelsesvidenskab, learning, digital literacy, media studies, education studies, learning, medievidenskab, media studies, læring, digital kompetence, digital dannelse, medievidenskab, uddannelsesvidenskab, digital kompetence, læring, education studies, digital dannelse, digital literacy
uddannelsesvidenskab, learning, digital literacy, media studies, education studies, learning, medievidenskab, media studies, læring, digital kompetence, digital dannelse, medievidenskab, uddannelsesvidenskab, digital kompetence, læring, education studies, digital dannelse, digital literacy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
