
doi: 10.1159/000497456
pmid: 31096214
Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) was introduced in the 1990s with the aim to decrease the rate of respiratory complications associated with thoracotomy, along with the benefits of reduced morbidity and a quicker return to normal activities provided by minimally invasive techniques. However, MIE is not routinely applied as a standard approach for esophageal cancer worldwide, due to the high technical complexity of this minimally invasive procedure. Therefore, the open transthoracic esophagectomy is considered to be the gold standard for resectable esophageal cancer worldwide nowadays. In this article, the current status of conventional MIE and robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy will be reviewed.
Thoracoscopy, Esophageal cancer, Gastroenterology, Review, Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy, Esophagectomy, Robotic Surgical Procedures, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Journal Article, Humans, Surgery, Laparoscopy, Minimally invasive esophagectomy
Thoracoscopy, Esophageal cancer, Gastroenterology, Review, Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy, Esophagectomy, Robotic Surgical Procedures, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Journal Article, Humans, Surgery, Laparoscopy, Minimally invasive esophagectomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 42 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
