Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao https://doi.org/10.1...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
https://doi.org/10.1159/000485...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2018 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Management of Cochlear Nerve Hypoplasia and Aplasia

Authors: Simon R. Freeman; Levent Sennaroglu;

Management of Cochlear Nerve Hypoplasia and Aplasia

Abstract

Approximately 2% of congenital profound deafness cases are due to cochlear nerve (CN) deficiency. MRI is essential to confirm if the nerve is deficient, but because of limitations with resolution, especially when the internal auditory canal is narrowed, it is often unable to distinguish between hypoplasia and aplasia. A full audiometric test battery should always be performed, even if the MRI suggests CN aplasia, as there will sometimes be evidence of audition. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response testing can be carried out transtympanically via the round window or using an intracochlear test electrode to help determine the status of the CN. If any test suggests the presence of a CN, then cochlear implantation (CI) should be considered. Children should be followed up closely with audiometric, electrophysiological and language assessments to determine the benefits. They may initially show benefit but fail to progress. CI results are variable and often result in poor outcomes with Categories of Auditory Perception scores of <5. Auditory brainstem implantation (ABI) can be considered when CI is contraindicated or fails to provide adequate benefit. This may provide better outcomes, but this form of surgery has greater risks and future device replacement (in case of device failure) may be complicated. Careful patient selection is required when considering ABI as significant learning difficulties make programming extremely challenging. Patients should be given the option of CI first and then ABI. A small minority of patients presenting late (around 2-3 years of age) may be candidates for simultaneous CI and ABI.

Keywords

Auditory Brain Stem Implantation, Cochlear Implantation, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cochlear Implants, Audiometry, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem, Humans, Hearing Loss, Cochlear Nerve

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    28
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
28
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!