
doi: 10.1159/000357114
pmid: 24603209
<b><i>Purpose:</i></b> To evaluate choroidal thickness in patients with idiopathic choroidal neovascularization. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The observational case series study included patients who were consecutively diagnosed with idiopathic unilateral choroidal neovascularization as demonstrated by ophthalmoscopy, fluorescein angiography and enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT). Using EDI-OCT, choroidal thickness was measured at the fovea and at locations in a distance of 500, 1,000 and 1,500 μm temporal and nasal to the fovea. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Mean subfoveal choroidal thickness was significantly (p = 0.002) thicker in the study group than in the control group (357 ± 99 vs. 316 ± 83 μm). In a parallel manner, the differences between the study group and the control group in choroidal thickness were significant for all other measurement points, except for the examination at 1,500 μm nasal to the fovea (p = 0.09). The results remained unchanged after adjusting for axial length and age. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Idiopathic unilateral choroidal neovascularization is associated with a thickening of the choroid.
Adult, Indocyanine Green, Male, Fovea Centralis, Adolescent, Choroid, Visual Acuity, Organ Size, Middle Aged, Choroidal Neovascularization, Ophthalmoscopy, Young Adult, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Fluorescein Angiography, Coloring Agents, Tomography, Optical Coherence
Adult, Indocyanine Green, Male, Fovea Centralis, Adolescent, Choroid, Visual Acuity, Organ Size, Middle Aged, Choroidal Neovascularization, Ophthalmoscopy, Young Adult, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Fluorescein Angiography, Coloring Agents, Tomography, Optical Coherence
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
