
Bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMCs) are suitable for bone tissue engineering. Comparative data regarding the needs of BMC for the adhesion on biomaterials and biocompatibility to various biomaterials are lacking to a large extent. Therefore, we evaluated whether a surface coating would enhance BMC adhesion and analyze the biocompatibility of three different kinds of biomaterials. BMCs were purified from human bone marrow aspirate samples. Beta tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP, without coating or coated with fibronectin or human plasma), demineralized bone matrix (DBM), and bovine cancellous bone (BS) were assessed. Seeding efficacy onβ-TCP was 95% regardless of the surface coating. BMC demonstrated a significantly increased initial adhesion on DBM andβ-TCP compared to BS. On day 14, metabolic activity was significantly increased in BMC seeded on DBM in comparison to BMC seeded on BS. Likewise increased VEGF-synthesis was observed on day 2 in BMC seeded on DBM when compared to BMC seeded on BS. The seeding efficacy of BMC on uncoated biomaterials is generally high although there are differences between these biomaterials. Beta-TCP and DBM were similar and both superior to BS, suggesting either as suitable materials for spatial restriction of BMC used for regenerative medicine purposesin vivo.
Calcium Phosphates, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, ddc:610, Tissue Engineering, 610, Bone Matrix, Biocompatible Materials, Bone Marrow Cells, Cell Count, Bone and Bones, Cell Adhesion, Leukocytes, Mononuclear, Animals, Humans, Cattle, Cells, Cultured, Research Article
Calcium Phosphates, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, ddc:610, Tissue Engineering, 610, Bone Matrix, Biocompatible Materials, Bone Marrow Cells, Cell Count, Bone and Bones, Cell Adhesion, Leukocytes, Mononuclear, Animals, Humans, Cattle, Cells, Cultured, Research Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 33 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
