
The sampling patterns, cost functions, and reconstruction algorithms play important roles in optimizing compressed sensing magnetic resonance imaging (CS-MRI). Simple random sampling patterns did not take into account the energy distribution ink-space and resulted in suboptimal reconstruction of MR images. Therefore, a variety of variable density (VD) based samplings patterns had been developed. To further improve it, we propose a novel energy preserving sampling (ePRESS) method. Besides, we improve the cost function by introducing phase correction and region of support matrix, and we propose iterative thresholding algorithm (ITA) to solve the improved cost function. We evaluate the proposed ePRESS sampling method, improved cost function, and ITA reconstruction algorithm by 2D digital phantom and 2Din vivoMR brains of healthy volunteers. These assessments demonstrate that the proposed ePRESS method performs better than VD, POWER, and BKO; the improved cost function can achieve better reconstruction quality than conventional cost function; and the ITA is faster than SISTA and is competitive with FISTA in terms of computation time.
Biomedical imaging and signal processing, Phantoms, Imaging, Brain, Models, Theoretical, Data Compression, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Healthy Volunteers, Reference Values, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Algorithms, Software, Research Article, Probability
Biomedical imaging and signal processing, Phantoms, Imaging, Brain, Models, Theoretical, Data Compression, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Healthy Volunteers, Reference Values, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Algorithms, Software, Research Article, Probability
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 27 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
