
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>doi: 10.1155/2008/659024
handle: 11590/157357
Several metrics have been proposed in literature to assess the perceptual quality of two-dimensional images. However, no similar effort has been devoted to quality assessment of stereoscopic images. Therefore, in this paper, we review the different issues related to 3D visualization, and we propose a quality metric for the assessment of stereopairs using the fusion of 2D quality metrics and of the depth information. The proposed metric is evaluated using the SAMVIQ methodology for subjective assessment. Specifically, distortions deriving from coding are taken into account and the quality degradation of the stereopair is estimated by means of subjective tests.
[INFO.INFO-TS]Computer Science [cs]/Signal and Image Processing, TK7800-8360, [INFO.INFO-TI] Computer Science [cs]/Image Processing [eess.IV], [INFO.INFO-TS] Computer Science [cs]/Signal and Image Processing, [INFO.INFO-TI]Computer Science [cs]/Image Processing [eess.IV], Signal Processing, Electronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, [SPI.SIGNAL]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Signal and Image processing, Information Systems, [SPI.SIGNAL] Engineering Sciences [physics]/Signal and Image processing
[INFO.INFO-TS]Computer Science [cs]/Signal and Image Processing, TK7800-8360, [INFO.INFO-TI] Computer Science [cs]/Image Processing [eess.IV], [INFO.INFO-TS] Computer Science [cs]/Signal and Image Processing, [INFO.INFO-TI]Computer Science [cs]/Image Processing [eess.IV], Signal Processing, Electronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, [SPI.SIGNAL]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Signal and Image processing, Information Systems, [SPI.SIGNAL] Engineering Sciences [physics]/Signal and Image processing
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 327 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
