
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>[Abstract] Python has become one of the most used and taught languages nowadays. Its expressiveness, cross-compatibility and ease of use have made it popular in areas as diverse as finance, bioinformatics or machine learning. However, Python programs are often significantly slower to execute than an equivalent native C implementation, especially for computation-intensive numerical kernels. This work presents PolyBench/Python, implementing the 30 kernels in PolyBench/C, one of the standard benchmark suites for polyhedral optimization, in Python. In addition to the benchmark kernels, a functional wrapper including mechanisms for performance measurement, testing, and execution configuration has been developed. The framework includes support for different ways to translate C-array codes into Python, offering insight into the tradeoffs of Python lists and NumPy arrays. The benchmark performance is thoroughly evaluated on different Python interpreters, and compared against its PolyBench/C counterpart to highlight the profitability (or lack thereof) of using Python for regular numerical codes. Ministerio de Ciencia e innovación; PID2019-104184RB-I00 Ministerio de Ciencia e innovación; AEI/10.13039/501100011033 U.S. National Science Foundation; CCF-1750399 Xunta de Galicia; ED431G 2019/01
Benchmarking, Polyhedral Compilation, [INFO.INFO-PF] Computer Science [cs]/Performance [cs.PF], [INFO] Computer Science [cs], JIT Optimization, Python
Benchmarking, Polyhedral Compilation, [INFO.INFO-PF] Computer Science [cs]/Performance [cs.PF], [INFO] Computer Science [cs], JIT Optimization, Python
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
