Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao https://doi.org/10.1...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
DBLP
Conference object
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Vandals and Hoaxes on the Web

Authors: Srijan Kumar;

Vandals and Hoaxes on the Web

Abstract

Web is a space for all, where everybody can read, publish and share information. This has had tremendous positive impact on the lives of billions of people. Wikipedia, being the largest encyclopedia and free, is a major source of information for many. However, since anyone can edit its articles, it is easy to add undesirable content and misinformation. These raise concerns about its credibility and safety, and that of the Web in general. In this talk, I will describe algorithms to identify two different aspects of undesirable actors and acts on Wikipedia: vandals and hoaxes.First, I will present the state-of-the-art system to detect vandals on Wikipedia called VEWS, which stands for Vandal Early Warning System [1]. Vandals are editors who make unconstructive edits on Wikipedia. VEWS models the editing behavior of all editors on Wikipedia, both benign and vandals, and then builds upon the differences in their behavior to identify the vandals. VEWS achieves an accuracy of over 85% and outperforms ClueBot NG and STiki, the best known algorithms that fight vandalism. Moreover, on average, VEWS detects vandals 2.39 edits before ClueBot NG. Furthermore, the combination of the two gives a fully automatic vandal early warning system with even higher accuracy.Second, I will present an in-depth study of hoaxes on Wikipedia [2]. Hoaxes are fake articles on Wikipedia that are deliberately created to mislead others. By studying over 22,000 hoaxes that have been created on Wikipedia, I will discuss their real-world impact, characteristics and finally, their detection. In terms of impact, while most hoaxes are detected quickly, a small number of hoaxes survive for a long time and are well cited across the Web. The characteristics of hoaxes are defined in terms of article structure and content, embeddedness in the rest of Wikipedia and the creator of the article. Finally, I will discuss an algorithm that uses these findings to determine whether an article is a hoax.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!