Comparison of Two Methods of Estimating the Variance of the Estimate of Catch Per Unit Effort

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Dec 1980 French Publisher:Canadian Science PublishingJournal:Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, volume 37, pages 2,346-2,351 (issn: 0706-652X, eissn: 1205-7533,

Copyright policy )

Authors: S. J. Smith;

doi: 10.1139/f80-280

Comparison of Two Methods of Estimating the Variance of the Estimate of Catch Per Unit Effort

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

Two methods of estimating the variance of the estimate of catch per unit effort are compared empirically here. The second method, an application of the Jackknife estimator proved to be the overall best technique due to its generality. In addition the Jackknife method provides means for the estimation of confidence intervals.Key words: catch per unit effort, variance estimation, Jackknife estimator

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	2
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average