Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of the Fishe...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada
Article . 1974 . Peer-reviewed
License: CSP TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

A Comparison of the Storage Life and Bacteria Counts of Chilled Cod Fillets Packaged in Wooden Boxes and Heat-Sealed Plastic Containers

Authors: S. Varga; W. A. Hirtle; W. E. Anderson;

A Comparison of the Storage Life and Bacteria Counts of Chilled Cod Fillets Packaged in Wooden Boxes and Heat-Sealed Plastic Containers

Abstract

Codfish held for 4 days on ice on board a dragger were filleted and the fillets were placed in two types of containers: (a) parchment-lined wooden boxes, (b) hermetically sealed plastic boxes. The boxes were stored at 0 C (32 F) for up to 8 days. Samples withdrawn at day 0, 4, 7, and 8 were analyzed for trimethylamine content and assessed for quality. The samples were also analyzed for total bacteria, total yeast and molds, lactobacilli, and anaerobic and facultative anaerobic spore- and nonspore-forming bacteria. The results indicated that the fish flesh had a total storage life of 10–11 days, regardless of packaging, and that the storage temperature of 0 C (32 F) was too low for the growth of anaerobic spore-forming bacteria.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!