Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of the Fishe...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada
Article . 1957 . Peer-reviewed
License: CSP TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Scale Characteristics of Yearling Coastal Cutthroat and Steelhead Trout

Authors: E. H. Vernon; R. G. McMynn;

Scale Characteristics of Yearling Coastal Cutthroat and Steelhead Trout

Abstract

Some scale characteristics of 88 yearling coastal cutthroat trout (Salmo clarki clarki) and 96 yearling steelhead (Salmo gairdneri) were compared in some detail. Although the number of diagonal scale rows above the lateral line was significantly higher in cutthroat, the counts of the two species overlap. The correlation of scale circuli counts with scale diameter was 0.94 for steelhead and 0.90 for cutthroat. At any given scale size cutthroat had 8 per cent more circuli than steelhead scales. Measurements of lateral and longitudinal diameters and anterior radii of scales show that the anterior portions of cutthroat scales tend to be longer and narrower than those of steelhead.Regression analyses of each scale measurement on fork length indicated that, for any given fork length, cutthroat scales are smaller than those of steelhead; the greatest difference being apparent when anterior radii are compared. Growth of scales in a dorsoventral plane approximates isauxesis in relation to fork length but scale growth in a longitudinal plane tends toward positive heterauxesis which is particularly pronounced in the anterior portions of scales.Multiple regression analyses of scale diameter, scale row count and fork length indicated that the smaller size of cutthroat scales is not balanced by proportionate increase in their number. When scale diameter is adjusted for scale number and fork length, cutthroat scales are 15.6 per cent smaller than those of steelhead, indicating that young cutthroat are covered by their scales with less overlap.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!