
doi: 10.1137/1139005
We describe various models, which can be approximated by binomial models of a market of securities [\textit{J. C. Cox}, \textit{S. A. Ross} and \textit{M. Rubinstein}, J. Financ. Econ. 7, No. 3, 229--263 (1979; Zbl 1131.91333)] and introduce the corresponding approximation formulas for the value of options. In order to obtain more general and more realistic limit models, we introduce additional randomizations into the binomial model. This leads, in particular, to models, which behave in a very diverse way, having ``heavy'' tails, strongly expressed peaks of densities, nonsymmetric densities u.s.w. In correspondence to the above-mentioned article approximation formulas for the cost of options are derived, examples are presented.
value of options, Derivative securities (option pricing, hedging, etc.), market of securities, Microeconomic theory (price theory and economic markets)
value of options, Derivative securities (option pricing, hedging, etc.), market of securities, Microeconomic theory (price theory and economic markets)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
