Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao zbMATH Openarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
zbMATH Open
Article
Data sources: zbMATH Open
SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing
Article . 1992 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
DBLP
Article . 1992
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

A Block Projection Method for Sparse Matrices

A block projection method for sparse matrices
Authors: Mario Arioli; Iain S. Duff; Joseph Noailles; Daniel Ruiz 0002;

A Block Projection Method for Sparse Matrices

Abstract

For the solution of systems of linear algebraic equations with sparse matrices the block Cimmino method is employed. Let the system be written as \[ \begin{pmatrix} A^ 1\\A^ 2\\\vdots\\ A^ p\end{pmatrix} x=\begin{pmatrix} b^ 1\\ b^ 2\\ \vdots \\b^ p\end{pmatrix} \] where the \(A^ i\) are matrices and the \(b^ i\) vectors. Let \(P_{R(A^ i)^ T}\) be the projector onto the image of the operator \((A^ i)^ T\) and \((A^ i)^ +\) be the matrix pseudo-inverse to \(A^ i\). The block Cimmino method has the following form: \(x^{(0)}\) is given, and it is assumed that \(k=0\). Before convergence is obtained the following calculations are performed: begin do in parallel for \(i=1(1)p\) \[ \delta^{i^{(K)}}=(A^ i)^ +b^ i- P_{R(A^ i)^ T}x^{(k)}=(A^ i)^ =(b^ i-A^ ix^{(k)}) \] \[ x^{(k+1)}:=x^{(k)}+\omega\sum^ p_{i=1}\delta^{i(k)} \] \[ k:=k+1 \] end. Special consideration is given to a block tridiagonal matrix. In order to accelerate convergence the method of conjugate gradients is employed. The convergence of the iteration strongly depends on the block partitioning of the input matrix. Several possible partitions are shown. Four tests are considered, numerical experiments with them are performed on an eight-processor computer Alliant FX/80. Block tridiagonal matrices are tested. The first system is obtained by an approximation of the Navier-Stokes equations coupled with the chemical kinetic equations by the finite volumes method. The second system is obtained by a similar approximation of the Euler equations of a transonic flow. The third system is the finite-difference approximation of the two- dimensional elliptic equation \(-u_{xx}-u_{yy}+1000e^{xy}(u_ x- u_ y)=g\) where the right-hand side \(g\) is selected so that the equation has the solution \(u=x+y\). The fourth system arises as the seven-point finite-difference approximation of the equation \(u_{xx}+u_{yy}+u_{zz}+100xu_ x-zu_ z+100(x+y+z)\cdot(xyz)^{- 1}u=F\) where the right-hand side is selected so that the equation has the solution \(u=\exp(xyz)\cdot\sin(\pi x)\cdot\sin(\pi y)\cdot\sin(\pi z)\). For these problems the effect of matrix scaling partitioning is studied. Rapid convergence for all tests is obtained.

Keywords

Iterative numerical methods for linear systems, Numerical solutions to overdetermined systems, pseudoinverses, finite volumes method, convergence, parallel processing, block iterative methods, sparse matrices, Numerical computation of matrix norms, conditioning, scaling, Parallel numerical computation, augmented systems, Numerical solution of discretized equations for boundary value problems involving PDEs, Euler equations, transonic flow, Computational methods for sparse matrices, chemical kinetic equations, partitioning, block Cimmino method, projection methods, conjugate gradient preconditioning, Navier-Stokes equations, numerical experiments

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    39
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
39
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!