
doi: 10.1137/0903018
We consider the problem of numerically generating the recursion coefficients of orthogonal polynomials, given an arbitrary weight distribution of either discrete, continuous, or mixed type. We discuss two classical methods, respectively due to Stieltjes and Chebyshev, and modern implementations of them, placing particular emphasis on their numerical stability properties. The latter are being studied by analyzing the numerical condition of appropriate finite-dimensional maps. A number of examples are given to illustrate the strengths and weaknesses of the various methods and to test the theory developed for them.
Orthogonal polynomials and functions of hypergeometric type (Jacobi, Laguerre, Hermite, Askey scheme, etc.), Computation of special functions and constants, construction of tables, recursion coefficients, condition numbers, modified Chebyshev algorithm, discretized Stieltjes procedure, recurrence relations for orthogonal polynomials
Orthogonal polynomials and functions of hypergeometric type (Jacobi, Laguerre, Hermite, Askey scheme, etc.), Computation of special functions and constants, construction of tables, recursion coefficients, condition numbers, modified Chebyshev algorithm, discretized Stieltjes procedure, recurrence relations for orthogonal polynomials
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 296 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
