
doi: 10.1137/0724051
The author considers \(\Delta u+2\sigma y^{-1}u_ y=f\) \((\sigma >0)\) on \(\Omega\), \(u=0\) on \(\Gamma\), \(u_ y=0\) on \(\Gamma_ 0\), where \(\Omega\) is a bounded convex domain in the upper half-plane, \(\partial \Omega\) intersects the x-axis in \(\Gamma_ 0\) and \(\Gamma_ 1\) is the rest of \(\partial \Omega\). The author uses the symmetric bilinear form \((y^{2\sigma}\nabla u,\nabla \phi)\) and for \(\sigma >1/2\) a nonsymmetric form with principle part (y \(\nabla u,\nabla \phi)\). \(\Gamma_ 1\) is assumed to be polygonal and to meet \(\Gamma_ 0\) at right angles. For a finite element approximation on a mesh of size h the author proves that in both formulations the solution is a best approximation in a weighted \(H^ 1\) seminorm, that convergence is optimal in a weighted \(L^ 2\) norm, and that in the symmetric formulation is ``almost best'' in \(L^{\infty}\). Numerical results indicate that the nonsymmetric formulation gives smaller errors.
numerical examples, Error bounds for boundary value problems involving PDEs, nonsymmetric bilinear form, degenerate elliptic equation, finite elements, Degenerate elliptic equations, error estimate, Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs, optimal order, optimal convergence
numerical examples, Error bounds for boundary value problems involving PDEs, nonsymmetric bilinear form, degenerate elliptic equation, finite elements, Degenerate elliptic equations, error estimate, Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs, optimal order, optimal convergence
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
