
doi: 10.1137/0724003
The parabolic problem: (1) \(u_ t-\nabla \cdot (D(\chi,t)\nabla u)=f(\chi,t,u)\) for \(x\in \Omega\), \(0\leq t\leq T\); \(\alpha (\chi_ 0)\partial u/\partial \nu +\beta (\chi_ 0)u=h(\chi_ 0,t)\) for \(\chi_ 0\in \partial \Omega\), \(0\leq t\leq T\), and \(u(0,\chi)=\psi (\chi)\) for \(\chi\in \Omega\) is approximated in the usual way by an implicit difference scheme. The purpose of the paper is to present iterative methods to solve directly the finite difference problem and to prove the convergence of its solution to that of (1). Two schemes based on the Jacobi and Gauss-Seidel methods for nonlinear algebraic equations are proposed, which eliminate the drawback of the usual iterative processes, consisting in the necessity in solving al each step of a linear system. The basic idea of the paper is to extend to the discrete case the monotonic approach to the exact solution. An interesting property of both schemes is that they preserve monotonicity, thus enabling the authors to derive error estimates as well as stability criteria.
Nonlinear initial, boundary and initial-boundary value problems for linear parabolic equations, convergence, Error bounds for boundary value problems involving PDEs, error estimates, stability criteria, iterative methods, Stability and convergence of numerical methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs, Jacobi method, implicit difference scheme, monotonicity, Gauss-Seidel methods
Nonlinear initial, boundary and initial-boundary value problems for linear parabolic equations, convergence, Error bounds for boundary value problems involving PDEs, error estimates, stability criteria, iterative methods, Stability and convergence of numerical methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs, Jacobi method, implicit difference scheme, monotonicity, Gauss-Seidel methods
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 46 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
