<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.1137/0205019
A bottom-up parsing technique which can make non-leftmost possible reductions in sentential forms is said to be non-canonical. Nearly every existing parsing technique can be extended to a non-canonical method which operates on larger classes of grammars and languages than the original technique. Moreover, the resulting parsers run in time linearly proportional to the length of their input strings. Several such extensions are defined and analyzed from the points of view of both power and decidability. The results are presented in terms of a general bottom-up parsing model which yields a common decision procedure for testing membership in many of the existing and extended classes.
General topics in the theory of software, Formal languages and automata
General topics in the theory of software, Formal languages and automata
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 29 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |