
doi: 10.1136/vr.l1794
pmid: 31000614
I write to voice my concern over a recent ethics case study published in In Practice (March 2019, vol 41, pp 88-91) that outlines a particular scenario on a pig farm where tail docking of pigs is addressed. This particular ethics case comes at a time when there is a huge amount of drive and progress being made within the pig sector to change protocols and procedures on farm to reduce the incidence of tail biting, and hence attempt to reduce the requirement for tail docking to be carried out in the first place. The elements that come together on a farm to produce tail biting are wide and varying, often with multiple potential triggers being present on any individual farm at a particular time. There …
Aggression, Tail, Sus scrofa, Animals, Bites and Stings, Animal Husbandry, Animal Welfare
Aggression, Tail, Sus scrofa, Animals, Bites and Stings, Animal Husbandry, Animal Welfare
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
