
doi: 10.1136/vr.k4914
pmid: 30467265
I wish to respond to the letters by McGill and others ( VR , 27 October 2018, vol 183, pp 510-511; 10 November 2018, vol 183, p 574). The first letter states ‘… the badger cull has produced no measurable reduction in the percentage of TB-infected herds in the cull zones’, and the second that ‘… no data was published from matched control areas to mitigate for confounding factors’. Both statements require explanation. McGill and others are correct that in the crude data, expressed on a …
Mustelidae, Animals, Cattle, Population Control, Tuberculosis, Bovine
Mustelidae, Animals, Cattle, Population Control, Tuberculosis, Bovine
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
