
pmid: 29891636
pmc: PMC6161654
Background Quantification of the burden of overweight on the healthcare system is becoming increasingly urgent for health policy, but accurate estimates are hard to obtain. Methods In order to assess healthcare utilisation and expenditure of overweight and non-overweight children, we linked, on an individual basis, data on body mass index from a birth cohort study with administrative health insurance claims data. In children aged 14–15 years, we compared utilisation and expenditure on general practice care, dental care, hospital/specialist care, prescribed medication, allied healthcare and mental healthcare of overweight children (overweight at age 11 and 14, n=80) and non-overweight children (no overweight at age 11 and 14, n=1253). Results For overweight children, mean 1-year healthcare expenditure was €837 per child and for non-overweight children €616. This difference was mainly due to significant differences in utilisation of hospital care (49% vs 37%) and mental healthcare (14% vs 7%) and to a lesser extent to higher expenditure per user. Conclusion Our results indicate the potential value of linking survey data to claims data in order to obtain insight into the healthcare costs of childhood overweight. Further studies should elucidate whether the observed differences are causally related to overweight.
obesity, Pediatric Obesity, Adolescent, Databases, Factual, IMPACT, Short Report, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, BMI, Insurance Claim Review, OBESITY, ADOLESCENTS, child health, Humans, COHORT, Health Expenditures, health services, Child, CHILDHOOD OVERWEIGHT, COSTS, Netherlands
obesity, Pediatric Obesity, Adolescent, Databases, Factual, IMPACT, Short Report, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, BMI, Insurance Claim Review, OBESITY, ADOLESCENTS, child health, Humans, COHORT, Health Expenditures, health services, Child, CHILDHOOD OVERWEIGHT, COSTS, Netherlands
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
