
doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1468
pmid: 26979642
I agree that The BMJ should not actively exclude qualitative research based on metrics,1 but what we need to consider is how qualitative research might be reinvented. As McCormack explains,2 much of it is currently, using a sports analogy, formulaic “post-game” interrogation. We (researchers) go all out and find “the player” (disadvantaged patient) during a break from “the game” (illness episode) …
Humans, Periodicals as Topic, Editorial Policies, Qualitative Research
Humans, Periodicals as Topic, Editorial Policies, Qualitative Research
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
