
pmc: PMC2540149 , PMC1771583
We read with interest the report by Radford et al on the incidence of acanthamoeba keratitis and the suggested relation with hardness of water.1 However, we disagree with their findings and believe their study is flawed for two reasons. This paper discusses the flaws.
Wales, 330, Contact Lenses, Incidence, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), Microbiology, Sensory Systems, Ophthalmology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, England, Acanthamoeba Keratitis, Risk Factors, Water Supply, Humans
Wales, 330, Contact Lenses, Incidence, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), Microbiology, Sensory Systems, Ophthalmology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, England, Acanthamoeba Keratitis, Risk Factors, Water Supply, Humans
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 48 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
