Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Auditory and cognitive aging: Differences between speech intelligibility and speech-in-speech intelligibility

Authors: Margaret Kathleen Pichora-Fuller;

Auditory and cognitive aging: Differences between speech intelligibility and speech-in-speech intelligibility

Abstract

Older adults, even those with normal or near-normal audiograms, report greater subjective listening difficulty in everyday life compared to younger adults. However, their difficulties are not well predicted from pure-tone or speech audiometry in quiet or noise. Speech intelligibility tests based on word recognition do not incorporate many of the sensory and cognitive challenges that listeners confront in everyday situations where it is necessary to understand a target talker when there are competing talkers in the auditory scene. Speech-in-speech intelligibility is affected by age-related differences in auditory and cognitive processing. Age-related differences in auditory temporal processing reduce access to periodicity and temporal envelope cues that serve stream segregation and spatial listening. Age-related differences in cognitive processing are reflected in difficulty remembering speech heard in multi-talker babble or switching spatial attention when there is uncertainty about the location of a target talker in a multi-talker display. Furthermore, when listening occurs in multi-tasking conditions (e.g., listening while walking), there are increased and competing demands for cognitive resources that may affect performance on listening and/or the competing tasks. These examples highlight the importance of both inter- and intra-individual differences in speech-in-speech intelligibility that depend on the interaction of auditory and cognitive processing abilities.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!