
The relationship between the intensity and loudness of self-generated (autophonic) speech remains invariant despite changes in auditory feedback, indicating that non-auditory processes contribute to this form of perception. The aim of the current study was to determine if the speech perception deficit associated with Parkinson's disease may be linked to deficits in such processes. Loudness magnitude estimates were obtained from parkinsonian and non-parkinsonian subjects across four separate conditions: self-produced speech under normal, perturbed, and masked auditory feedback, as well as auditory presentation of pre-recorded speech (passive listening). Slopes and intercepts of loudness curves were compared across groups and conditions. A significant difference in slope was found between autophonic and passive-listening conditions for both groups. Unlike control subjects, parkinsonian subjects' magnitude estimates under auditory masking increased in variability and did not show as strong a shift in intercept values. These results suggest that individuals with Parkinson's disease rely on auditory feedback to compensate for underlying deficits in sensorimotor integration important in establishing and regulating autophonic loudness.
Aged, 80 and over, Male, Voice Quality, Loudness Perception, Auditory Threshold, Parkinson Disease, Middle Aged, Acoustic Stimulation, Feedback, Sensory, Case-Control Studies, Speech Perception, Audiometry, Pure-Tone, Humans, Female, Audiometry, Speech, Perceptual Masking, Aged
Aged, 80 and over, Male, Voice Quality, Loudness Perception, Auditory Threshold, Parkinson Disease, Middle Aged, Acoustic Stimulation, Feedback, Sensory, Case-Control Studies, Speech Perception, Audiometry, Pure-Tone, Humans, Female, Audiometry, Speech, Perceptual Masking, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
