
Evidence for transfer of musical training to better perception of speech in noise has been mixed. Unlike speech-in-noise, speech-on-speech perception utilizes many of the skills that musical training improves, such as better pitch perception and stream segregation, as well as use of higher-level auditory cognitive functions, such as attention. Indeed, despite the few non-musicians who performed as well as musicians, on a group level, there was a strong musician benefit for speech perception in a speech masker. This benefit does not seem to result from better voice processing and could instead be related to better stream segregation or enhanced cognitive functions.
Adult, Male, Speech Intelligibility, Singing, Sound Discrimination, Young Adult, Cognition, Acoustic Stimulation, Speech Perception, Musical Training, Humans, Attention, Female, Cues, Audiometry, Speech, Noise, Pitch Perception, Acoustic modeling, Perceptual Masking, Music
Adult, Male, Speech Intelligibility, Singing, Sound Discrimination, Young Adult, Cognition, Acoustic Stimulation, Speech Perception, Musical Training, Humans, Attention, Female, Cues, Audiometry, Speech, Noise, Pitch Perception, Acoustic modeling, Perceptual Masking, Music
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 97 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
