Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Quantifying supra-threshold sensory deficits in listeners with normal hearing thresholds

Authors: Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; Hari Bharadwaj; Inyong Choi; Hannah Goldberg; Salwa Masud; Golbarg Mehraei;

Quantifying supra-threshold sensory deficits in listeners with normal hearing thresholds

Abstract

There is growing suspicion that some listeners with normal-hearing thresholds may be suffering from a specific form of sensory deficit—a loss of afferent auditory nerve fibers. We believe such deficits manifest behaviorally in conditions where perception depends upon precise spectro-temporal coding of supra-threshold sound. In our lab, we find striking inter-subject differences in perceptual ability even among listeners with normal hearing thresholds who have no complaints of hearing difficulty and have never sought clinical intervention. Among such ordinary listeners, those who perform relatively poorly on selective attention tasks (requiring the listener to focus on one sound stream presented amidst competing sound streams) also exhibit relatively weak temporal coding in subcortical responses and have poor thresholds for detecting fine temporal cues in supra-threshold sound. Here, we review the evidence for supra-threshold hearing deficits and describe measures that reveal this sensory loss. Given our findings in ordinary adult listeners, it stands to reason that at least a portion of the listeners who are diagnosed with central auditory processing dysfunction may suffer from similar sensory deficits, explaining why they have trouble communicating in many everyday social settings.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!