Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Comparing the acoustics of voiced and voiceless fricatives in Deg Xinag

Authors: Richard Wright; Sharon Hargus; Julia Miller;

Comparing the acoustics of voiced and voiceless fricatives in Deg Xinag

Abstract

Few studies have looked at the acoustic properties of fricative voicing and place in Native American languages despite their relatively rich fricative inventories of rarely studied fricative places. Deg Xinag, an endangered Athabaskan language spoken in Alaska, provides us with a rare opportunity to investigate fricative place and voicing within a single language: it has eight places of articulation for voiceless fricatives, six of which have voiced counterparts, including some rarely studied place contrasts (e.g., palato-alveolar versus retroflex, uvular versus glottal, lateral versus alveolar). In this study, pre- and post-vocalic fricatives were digitally recorded in the field from eight speakers (two males, six females) using a head-mounted mic to control for distance from the source. The segmental context was also controlled for, the neighboring vowel being [a] in all cases. Each speaker produced four repetitions of each word. Each fricative was analyzed qualitatively using impressionistic transcription and spectrographic investigation, and quantitatively using a set of widely employed measures: (a) widely employed spectral measures (center of gravity, skew, kurtosis, standard deviation, lowest spectral peak), peak and rms intensity of frication, overall duration and duration of voicing. [Work supported by NSF.]

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!