Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Measuring perceptual equality

Authors: Thomas Portele;

Measuring perceptual equality

Abstract

When performing F0 stylizations and parametrizations in order to establish the essential parts of an F0 contour, it is necessary to assess the similarity between original and stylized contours. The most reliable method is a perceptual assessment, which means in its most severe form that no differences are perceptible between original and resynthesized versions. Such tests have a number of possible influences (resynthesis quality, auditory storage, whether or not perceptible diffences are included), and they are tedious and time-consuming, as will be exemplified by results obtained in the evaluation of this maximum-based description. Computational comparisons, on the other hand, are unable to mirror human perception, because it is well known that small differences in the acoustic domain may be perceived while larger differences may pass unnoticed. The mean difference, as measured by some researchers, is problematic, because the goal of stylization is to abstract away from unimportant features. A successful stylization is perceptually equal to the original but has a large mean difference caused by successful abstraction. The current limited knowledge of pitch perception and interpretation requires perceptual tests to evaluate stylization quality.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!