
pmid: 16583924
Many theories of nonhuman animal communication posit a first-order Markov model in which the next signal depends only on the current one. Such a model precludes a hierarchical structure to the communication signal. Information theory and signal processing provide quantitative techniques to estimate the underlying complexity of an arbitrary signal or symbol sequence. These techniques are applied to humpback whale songs and demonstrate that any first-order Markov model fails to attain the underlying bound of complexity in these songs. Humpback songs are symbolized into alphabet sequences using spectrograms and self-organizing neural nets [Walker, unpublished]. The entropy of the song sequence is measured with a first-order parametric Markov model, and with a nonparametric sliding window method [Kontoyiannis et al., IEEE Trans. Info. Theory 44, 1319–1327 (1998)]. Preliminary analyses suggest that the entropy of the first-order Markov model is significantly higher than that of the nonparametric model, meaning that any first-order Markov source cannot reasonably model humpback songs. Furthermore, it is found that the symbolized song statistics are locally but not globally stationary, implying that these songs possess a hierarchical structure. [Work supported by NSF Ocean Sciences.]
Sound Spectrography, Entropy, Acoustics, Models, Biological, Markov Chains, Animals, Vocalization, Animal, Humpback Whale
Sound Spectrography, Entropy, Acoustics, Models, Biological, Markov Chains, Animals, Vocalization, Animal, Humpback Whale
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 126 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
