Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Weighting of prosodic cues in language discrimination by infants and adults

Authors: Chad J. Vicenik; Megha Sundara;

Weighting of prosodic cues in language discrimination by infants and adults

Abstract

Previous research has shown that infants and adults can discriminate between prosodically similar languages using only prosodic cues. These experiments were designed to determine whether listeners use pitch cues or segmental duration and timing cues (i.e., rhythm cues) in language discrimination. We tested American English learning 7-month-old infants and adults on their ability to discriminate between sentences in American English and German that had been re-synthesized to isolate different cues. Infants were presented with low-pass filtered speech and speech with re-synthesized sinusoidal pitch. Adults were presented with low-pass filtered speech and two conditions where sonorants were replaced with /a/ and obstruents were replaced with silence: one contained both pitch and durational cues and the other contained only durational cues. Pitch cues were important for infants as well as adults. For infants, pitch cues were necessary for successful language discrimination; neither segmental nor durational cues were sufficient. For adults, the presence of pitch prevented listeners from discriminating English and German. Only when pitch cues were removed did adults rely on durational differences to distinguish languages. These results demonstrate that to distinguish prosodically similar languages, specifically English and German, American English listeners' weight pitch cues over durational cues.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!