<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.1121/1.2934829
In this paper different well-established methods of reverberation time measurement are compared. Furthermore, the results obtained using these methods are compared to the results provided by some additional methods which could serve as an in situ tool if, for any reason, the reverberation time measurements cannot be carried out using the standardized methods. The methods compared in this paper include the standardized methods (EN ISO 3382:2000), namely the impulse response measured with pink noise, exponential sweep, MLS, but also pistol shots of different calibers, balloon bursts, gated external pink noise, and the B&K filtered burst method. In order to make the comparison, the measurements were performed in four acoustically very different spaces - a rather small and well-damped listening room, a much bigger damped listening room, a rather reverberant atrium, and a large and very reverberant shoebox-shaped room. The results were evaluated according to signal-to-noise ratio criterion as well. Special attention has been given to the influence of room modes on measurement results.
impulsive sound sources, reverberation time measurment; room impulse response; impulsive sound sources; omnidirectional sources, room impulse response, reverberation time measurment, omnidirectional sources
impulsive sound sources, reverberation time measurment; room impulse response; impulsive sound sources; omnidirectional sources, room impulse response, reverberation time measurment, omnidirectional sources
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |