Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ The Journal of the A...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Article . 1981 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

A comparative evaluation of multiple-choice word intelligibility tests

Authors: Nallan C. A. Chari; Lloyd L. Price; Thomas F. Williams; Jean F. Kernaghan;

A comparative evaluation of multiple-choice word intelligibility tests

Abstract

Intelligibility scores obtained with the Modified Rhyme Test (MRT), Oklahoma University Closed-Response Test (OUCRT), and the California Consonant Test (CCT) were compared. The word lists were recorded by a male speaker with general American English dialect. Twenty-four normal-hearing subjects heard the three lists monaurally at most comfortable loudness level. Four listening conditions, namely, lowband (100–1500 Hz), highband (2000–6000 Hz), speech-in-noise (S/N ratio = 0 dB), and wideband (100–6000 Hz) were employed. The mean intelligibility scores for the three lists across the four listening conditions ranged from 99.2% through 45.3%. An analysis of these findings from practical considerations will be discussed.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
bronze
Beta
sdg_colorsSDGs:
Related to Research communities