Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Correction for spatial scaling bias of bivariate LAI with a general spatialization method

Authors: Ling-ling Ma; Chuan-rong Li; Ling-li Tang; Kai Bao; Xin-hong Wang;

Correction for spatial scaling bias of bivariate LAI with a general spatialization method

Abstract

As a key input parameter in many climate and land-atmosphere models, the validation of retrieved leaf area index (LAI) on regional scale from remote sensing data makes great senses. The problem of scale between the field experiments and the ground parameters retrieved from satellites is still one of the most difficult problems in the validation of satellite remote sensing data. The difficulty is twofold: First, the field measurements are not exhaustive; Secondly, the model is not linear and surface on satellite pixels is not homogenous. Therefore the objective of the scaling transform study is to estimate a non-linear function describing spatial distribution information of pixels from information on sub-pixels. The Computational Geometry Model is a general spatialization method which can realize the scaling of non-linear and discontinuous function. However it needs a large amount of computing time and a special algorithm to retrieve convex hull when facing a large number of input arguments. In this paper QuickHull algorithm is introduced to resolve the scaling problem of the bivariate LAI retrieval function. The scaling effect is analyzed through aggregating the high-resolution LAI (pixel size of 30 meters) retrieved from TM images by means of CGM method and directly aggregated method respectively. The CGM method is proved to have the capability of improving the scaling effect of LAI at larger aggregated scales. It is a prospect method to resolve the scaling problem and will take effect for the validation with limited field experiments.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!