
doi: 10.1117/12.2018231
One of the differences between the near-field integral imaging (NInI) and the far-field integral imaging (FInI), is the ratio between number of elemental images and number of pixels per elemental image. While in NInI the 3D information is codified in a small number of elemental images (with many pixels each), in FInI the information is codified in many elemental images (with only a few pixels each). The later codification is similar that the one needed for projecting the InI field onto a pixelated display when aimed to build an InI monitor. For this reason, the FInI cameras are specially adapted for capturing the InI field with display purposes. In this contribution we research the relations between the images captured in NInI and FInI modes, and develop the algorithm that permits the projection of NInI images onto an InI monitor.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
