
doi: 10.1113/ep088870 , 10.1177/0271678x20943823 , 10.1186/s12917-020-02451-y , 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410 , 10.1111/bph.15193 , 10.1113/jp280389 , 10.7892/boris.147293
pmc: PMC7393194 , PMC7430098 , PMC7359286 , PMC7610696 , PMC7610926 , PMC7610906 , PMC7360023
handle: 20.500.11820/cddad5d6-611f-4cdf-b6c4-c683e4dc0c7f , 20.500.11820/ee0f1a13-646f-427c-97ed-bf9a45556054 , 20.500.11820/14457ce5-b4b3-4387-9709-902df7da92d4 , 20.500.11820/ebda5965-b989-4a54-aff3-cf2e8a8b6000 , 10044/1/81784 , 11343/306393 , 11343/306392 , 10044/1/81785 , 10044/1/81791 , 1983/5c695515-4537-464d-901a-d9e357ff0c64
doi: 10.1113/ep088870 , 10.1177/0271678x20943823 , 10.1186/s12917-020-02451-y , 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410 , 10.1111/bph.15193 , 10.1113/jp280389 , 10.7892/boris.147293
pmc: PMC7393194 , PMC7430098 , PMC7359286 , PMC7610696 , PMC7610926 , PMC7610906 , PMC7360023
handle: 20.500.11820/cddad5d6-611f-4cdf-b6c4-c683e4dc0c7f , 20.500.11820/ee0f1a13-646f-427c-97ed-bf9a45556054 , 20.500.11820/14457ce5-b4b3-4387-9709-902df7da92d4 , 20.500.11820/ebda5965-b989-4a54-aff3-cf2e8a8b6000 , 10044/1/81784 , 11343/306393 , 11343/306392 , 10044/1/81785 , 10044/1/81791 , 1983/5c695515-4537-464d-901a-d9e357ff0c64
AbstractReproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research. They consist of a checklist of information to include in publications describing in vivo experiments to enable others to scrutinise the work adequately, evaluate its methodological rigour, and reproduce the methods and results. Despite considerable levels of endorsement by funders and journals over the years, adherence to the guidelines has been inconsistent, and the anticipated improvements in the quality of reporting in animal research publications have not been achieved. Here, we introduce ARRIVE 2.0. The guidelines have been updated and information reorganised to facilitate their use in practice. We used a Delphi exercise to prioritise and divide the items of the guidelines into 2 sets, the “ARRIVE Essential 10,” which constitutes the minimum requirement, and the “Recommended Set,” which describes the research context. This division facilitates improved reporting of animal research by supporting a stepwise approach to implementation. This helps journal editors and reviewers verify that the most important items are being reported in manuscripts. We have also developed the accompanying Explanation and Elaboration document, which serves (1) to explain the rationale behind each item in the guidelines, (2) to clarify key concepts, and (3) to provide illustrative examples. We aim, through these changes, to help ensure that researchers, reviewers, and journal editors are better equipped to improve the rigour and transparency of the scientific process and thus reproducibility.
Life Sciences & Biomedicine - Other Topics, Research Report, Physiology, Veterinary medicine, Reporting and Conduct Guidelines, Guideline, 0601 Biochemistry and Cell Biology, ARRIVE, reporting guidelines, DESIGN, IMPROVING BIOSCIENCE RESEARCH, w_20.55, REPRODUCIBILITY, SF600-1100, Pharmacology & Pharmacy, Biology (General), 11 Medical and Health Sciences, POLICIES, General Medicine, w_20.5, Checklist, Neurology, Research Design, Perspective, 1115 Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, 0605 Microbiology, STANDARDS, Animal Experimentation, Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Opinion, QH301-705.5, Clinical Neurology, 610, Guidelines as Topic, qy_25, 07 Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, CALL, Animals, Veterinary Sciences, Biology, reproducibility, animal research, IN-VIVO EXPERIMENTS, Pharmacology, Science & Technology, General Veterinary, 0707 Veterinary Sciences, Reproducibility of Results, 06 Biological Sciences, wb_60, Developmental Biology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine - Other Topics, Research Report, Physiology, Veterinary medicine, Reporting and Conduct Guidelines, Guideline, 0601 Biochemistry and Cell Biology, ARRIVE, reporting guidelines, DESIGN, IMPROVING BIOSCIENCE RESEARCH, w_20.55, REPRODUCIBILITY, SF600-1100, Pharmacology & Pharmacy, Biology (General), 11 Medical and Health Sciences, POLICIES, General Medicine, w_20.5, Checklist, Neurology, Research Design, Perspective, 1115 Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, 0605 Microbiology, STANDARDS, Animal Experimentation, Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Opinion, QH301-705.5, Clinical Neurology, 610, Guidelines as Topic, qy_25, 07 Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, CALL, Animals, Veterinary Sciences, Biology, reproducibility, animal research, IN-VIVO EXPERIMENTS, Pharmacology, Science & Technology, General Veterinary, 0707 Veterinary Sciences, Reproducibility of Results, 06 Biological Sciences, wb_60, Developmental Biology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7K | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.01% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.01% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.01% |
