
arXiv: 1208.1421
By developing a connection between partial theta functions and Appell-Lerch sums, we find and prove a formula which expresses Hecke-type double sums in terms of Appell-Lerch sums and theta functions. Not only does our formula prove classical Hecke-type double sum identities such as those found in work Kac and Peterson on affine Lie Algebras and Hecke modular forms, but once we have the Hecke-type forms for Ramanujan's mock theta functions our formula gives straightforward proofs of many of the classical mock theta function identities. In particular, we obtain a new proof of the mock theta conjectures. Our formula also applies to positive-level string functions associated with admissable representations of the affine Lie Algebra $A_1^{(1)}$ as introduced by Kac and Wakimoto.
Ranks, Mathematics - Number Theory, Maass Forms, Proof, Dimensional Lie-Algebras, Binomial coefficients; factorials; \(q\)-identities, Partition identities; identities of Rogers-Ramanujan type, 2600 Mathematics, FOS: Mathematics, Ramanujan Lost Notebook, Theta series; Weil representation; theta correspondences, Number Theory (math.NT), Conjectures, Holomorphic modular forms of integral weight
Ranks, Mathematics - Number Theory, Maass Forms, Proof, Dimensional Lie-Algebras, Binomial coefficients; factorials; \(q\)-identities, Partition identities; identities of Rogers-Ramanujan type, 2600 Mathematics, FOS: Mathematics, Ramanujan Lost Notebook, Theta series; Weil representation; theta correspondences, Number Theory (math.NT), Conjectures, Holomorphic modular forms of integral weight
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 126 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
