Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Veterinary Ophthalmo...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Veterinary Ophthalmology
Article . 2016 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Impact of fungal species cultured on outcome in horses with fungal keratitis

Authors: Brian C. Gilger; Amanda B. Sherman; Alison B. Clode;

Impact of fungal species cultured on outcome in horses with fungal keratitis

Abstract

AbstractPurposeTo determine the significance ofAspergillusandFusariumspp., as identified by culture, on clinical outcome in equine keratomycosis.MethodsRetrospective analysis of 66 horses (66 eyes) evaluated at the NCSU‐VH diagnosed with keratomycosis from whichAspergillusorFusariumspp. were cultured. Horses were classified into those who improved with medical management alone or those who required surgical intervention to improve. Horses who underwent surgery were divided into globe‐sparing procedures or enucleation. Effects of bacterial co‐infection, previous topical steroid or antifungal use, and time of year on fungal genus and outcome were evaluated.ResultsAspergillusspp. was cultured from 41 eyes (63%), while 24 eyes (37%) culturedFusariumspp. One horse cultured both species and was not included in further evaluation. From the horses that culturedAspergillusspp., 28 eyes (68%) required surgical intervention to control the infection: 21 (75%) of these eyes maintained globe integrity, while 7 eyes (25%) were enucleated. Of those horses withFusariumspp., 14 eyes (58%) required surgical intervention: 11 (79%) of these eyes maintained globe integrity, while 3 eyes (21%) were enucleated. Genus of fungus cultured was not significantly associated with the need for surgical intervention nor was it significantly associated with the necessity of globe‐sparing surgery versus enucleation. Additionally, bacterial co‐infection, previous steroidal or antifungal use, and time of year did not affect outcome or type of fungal species cultured.ConclusionEquine keratomycosis fromFusariumspp. compared to keratomycosis fromAspergillusspp. is not associated with a different clinical outcome.

Keywords

Keratitis, Male, Antifungal Agents, Eye Infections, Bacterial, Aspergillus, Treatment Outcome, Fusarium, Fusariosis, Animals, Aspergillosis, Female, Horse Diseases, Steroids, Horses, Eye Infections, Fungal, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    32
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
32
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!