
AbstractIn this paper, we address the role of countries’ goods‐trade networks for their services‐trade volume. The paper employs a large cross section of bilateral trade data on aggregate cross‐border goods and services sales and illustrates that the depth and overlap of two countries’ services networks induce a positive direct impact on their services‐trade volume. The evidence takes into account that goods trade flows and networks are potentially endogenous so that the estimated direct effects support a causal interpretation. We find that the magnitude of the multilateral goods‐trade network effect on the bilateral services‐trade volume is much larger than that of bilateral goods‐trade volume.
Economics and Econometrics, Accounting, Political Science and International Relations, Finance
Economics and Econometrics, Accounting, Political Science and International Relations, Finance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
