
doi: 10.1111/twec.12267
handle: 2078.1/152126 , 10419/269706
AbstractThis paper studies the effect of liberalising the international mobility of college‐educated workers on the world economy. First, we combine data on effective and desired migration to identify the net pool of foreign talents (NPFT) of selected high‐income countries. So far, the EU‐15 has poorly benefited from its NPFT while the US has mobilised a large portion of it. Second, we use a micro‐founded model to simulate the effects of skill‐selective liberalisation shocks. In our benchmark model, a worldwide liberalisation induces larger long‐run income gains for the EU‐15 (+8.8 per cent) than for the US (+5.9 per cent). However, less attractive EU countries such as Austria, Belgium, Germany, Greece, Luxembourg and the Netherlands benefit less than the US. In addition, liberalising high‐skilled migration decreases income per worker by 2.5 per cent in developing countries. Overall, it increases efficiency (+6.2 per cent in the worldwide average level of income per capita) and inequality (+1.2 percentage points in the Theil inequality index). Much greater effects can be obtained if total factor productivity varies with human capital.
inequality, ddc:330, growth, migration, human capital, brain drain, brain drain, human capital, migration, growth,inequality, jel: jel:F22, jel: jel:I24, jel: jel:O15
inequality, ddc:330, growth, migration, human capital, brain drain, brain drain, human capital, migration, growth,inequality, jel: jel:F22, jel: jel:I24, jel: jel:O15
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 38 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
