
doi: 10.1111/tpj.16856
pmid: 38831668
SUMMARY Genome annotation files play a critical role in dictating the quality of downstream analyses by providing essential predictions for gene positions and structures. These files are pivotal in decoding the complex information encoded within DNA sequences. Here, we generated experimental data resolving RNA 5′‐ and 3′‐ends as well as full‐length RNAs for cassava TME12 sticklings in ambient temperature and cold. We used these data to generate genome annotation files using the TranscriptomeReconstructoR (TR) tool. A careful comparison to high‐quality genome annotations suggests that our new TR genome annotations identified additional genes, resolved the transcript boundaries more accurately and identified additional RNA isoforms. We enhanced existing cassava genome annotation files with the information from TR that maintained the different transcript models as RNA isoforms. The resultant merged annotation was subsequently utilized for comprehensive analysis. To examine the effects of genome annotation files on gene expression studies, we compared the detection of differentially expressed genes during cold using the same RNA‐seq data but alternative genome annotation files. We found that our merged genome annotation that included cold‐specific TR gene models identified about twice as many cold‐induced genes. These data indicate that environmentally induced genes may be missing in off‐the‐shelf genome annotation files. In conclusion, TR offers the opportunity to enhance crop genome annotations with implications for the discovery of differentially expressed candidate genes during plant–environment interactions.
Manihot, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, RNA, Plant, Gene Expression Profiling, Molecular Sequence Annotation, Transcriptome, Genome, Plant
Manihot, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, RNA, Plant, Gene Expression Profiling, Molecular Sequence Annotation, Transcriptome, Genome, Plant
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
