
In this toolbox, the authors use the example of their own faculty member writing group to offer suggestions for setting up peer mentorship. They describe the potential pitfalls and recommend that participants share similar backgrounds, interests and aims. Regular meetings are important for goal setting and motivation. Group members review each other's work in a safe environment, and share in each other's successes.
Publishing, Faculty, Medical, Technical and Professional Writing, Writing, Mentors, Social Support, Efficiency, Health and Medical Administration, Medical Education, Research Support as Topic, Humans, UMCCTS funding, Translational Medical Research
Publishing, Faculty, Medical, Technical and Professional Writing, Writing, Mentors, Social Support, Efficiency, Health and Medical Administration, Medical Education, Research Support as Topic, Humans, UMCCTS funding, Translational Medical Research
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
