
doi: 10.1111/tct.12296
pmid: 26009956
Summary Background Although postgraduate trainees play a well‐accepted role in medical education, little consideration has traditionally been given to senior undergraduate trainees as teachers. Recently, research has shown senior medical students ( SMS ) can play an effective teaching role for junior medical students ( JMS ) in non‐clinical medical settings. Purpose The purpose of our study was to understand the perceptions of SMS s as teachers in a clinical environment for JMS . Method All students who participated in our peer‐led bedside teaching programme from September 2010 to May 2012 were invited to complete a questionnaire following their teaching session. Fifty‐six of 70 JMS (80%) and 15 of 15 SMS (100%) participated. Survey questions addressed learning, bedside experiences, teacher effectiveness and the overall usefulness of these sessions. The data collected were analysed for significance of the perceptions reported. Results We found students reported positive and statistically significant results in all domains examined. JMS reported that sessions were highly valuable learning, improved confidence and comfort at the bedside, had excellent teaching and were a valuable addition to their clinical skills training. SMS reported getting highly valuable learning through preparation and developing improved comfort in a teaching role. Little consideration has traditionally been given to senior undergraduate trainees as teachers Conclusions Our findings demonstrate that peer‐directed learning in undergraduate medical education can be effectively implemented in the clinical arena.
Attitude of Health Personnel, Teaching, Peer Group, Cross-Sectional Studies, Teaching Rounds, Humans, Learning, Clinical Competence, Education, Medical, Undergraduate
Attitude of Health Personnel, Teaching, Peer Group, Cross-Sectional Studies, Teaching Rounds, Humans, Learning, Clinical Competence, Education, Medical, Undergraduate
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
