
Abstract Ammonium sulphate is widely used as a sulphur (S) fertilizer, constituting about 50% of global S use. Within nitrogen (N) management, it is well known that ammonium‐based fertilizers are subject to ammonia (NH 3 ) volatilization in soils with pH > 7, but this has been overlooked in decision making on S fertilization. We reviewed 41 publications reporting measurements of NH 3 loss from ammonium sulphate in 16 countries covering a wide range of soil types and climates. In field experiments, loss was mostly <5% of applied N in soils with pH (in water) <7.0. In soils with pH > 7.0, there was a wide range of losses (0%–66%), with many in the 20%–40% range and some indication of increased loss (ca. 5%–15%) in soils with pH 6.5–7.0. We estimate that replacing ammonium sulphate with a different form of S for arable crops could decrease NH 3 emissions from this source by 90%, even taking account of likely emissions from alternative fertilizers to replace the N, but chosen for low NH 3 emission. For every kt of ammonium sulphate replaced on soils of pH > 7.0 in temperate regions, NH 3 emission would decrease from 35.7 to 3.6 t NH 3 . Other readily available sources of S include single superphosphate, potassium sulphate, magnesium sulphate, calcium sulphate dihydrate (gypsum), and polyhalite (Polysulphate). In view of the large areas of high pH soils globally, this change of S fertilizer selection would make a significant contribution to decreasing NH 3 emissions worldwide, contributing to necessary cuts to meet agreed ceilings under the Gothenburg Convention.
Sulphur, Fertilizer, Ammonia, Gothenburg Convention, Volatilization, Soil Nutrient Management, Ammonium sulphate
Sulphur, Fertilizer, Ammonia, Gothenburg Convention, Volatilization, Soil Nutrient Management, Ammonium sulphate
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 69 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
