
doi: 10.1111/stul.12024
handle: 11368/3031551 , 11562/911192
AbstractThe goal of this article is to provide a principled account of the semantic contribution of the so‐called “expletive” negation, as it occurs in negative exclamatives. This type of negation differs from canonical negation in that it does not contribute its canonical meaning as a propositional operator, occurs higher in the syntactic structure of the clause, does not license negative polarity items, and expresses a bias towards the opposite polarity. In this article, we show that these properties are also found in negative rhetorical questions. We propose that exclamatives, as well as rhetorical questions, denote sets of propositions structured into Boolean algebras, with the negation imposing an order of informativity upon such structures.
Informativity, Exclamative, Negation; exclamatives; logical form, Rhetorical Question, Exclamatives; Negation: Expletive Negation; Rhetorical Questions; Informativity, Negation: Expletive Negation
Informativity, Exclamative, Negation; exclamatives; logical form, Rhetorical Question, Exclamatives; Negation: Expletive Negation; Rhetorical Questions; Informativity, Negation: Expletive Negation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
