
doi: 10.1111/stan.12356
AbstractRecently, nonresponse rates in sample surveys have been increasing. Nonresponse bias is a serious concern in the analysis of sample surveys. The calibration and propensity score methods are used to adjust nonresponse bias. The propensity score method uses the weights of the inverse probability of response. The inverse probability of response is estimated by the auxiliary variables observed in respondents and nonrespondents. The calibration method can use additional auxiliary variables observed only in respondents if the population distributions of the variables are known. The calibration method is widely used; however, the theoretical property in the nonresponse situation has not been investigated. This study provides a condition that the calibration weights asymptotically go to the inverse probability of response and clarifies the relationship between the calibration and propensity score methods.
nonresponse bias, missing data, Statistics, calibration, propensity score
nonresponse bias, missing data, Statistics, calibration, propensity score
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
