
doi: 10.1111/sms.14109
pmid: 34861076
This review aimed to conduct a meta‐analysis of studies examining the effects of caffeine on rate of force development (RFD). Ten databases were searched to find relevant studies. Risk of bias (RoB) of the included studies was evaluated. Data were analyzed in a random‐effects meta‐analysis. Eleven studies with “some concerns” regarding RoB were included. In the main meta‐analysis, there was a significant ergogenic effect of caffeine ingestion on RFD (Hedges’ g = 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21, 0.52; p < 0.0001). An ergogenic effect of caffeine was also found on RFD during resistance exercises (Hedges’ g = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.30, 0.67; p < 0.0001), but not during the countermovement jump test (Hedges’ g = 0.18; 95% CI: –0.02, 0.39; p = 0.08), with a significant difference between the subgroups (p = 0.03). Small‐to‐moderate (3–5 mg/kg; Hedges’ g = 0.25; 95% CI: 0.09, 0.41; p = 0.002) and moderate‐to‐high caffeine doses (6–10 mg/kg) enhanced RFD (Hedges’ g = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.30, 0.85; p < 0.0001), even though the effects were larger with higher caffeine doses (p = 0.04). Overall, caffeine ingestion increases RFD, which is relevant given that RFD is commonly associated with sport‐specific tasks. From a practical perspective: (1) individuals interested in the acute enhancement of RFD in resistance exercise may consider supplementing with caffeine; and (2) given that evaluation of RFD is most commonly used for testing purposes, caffeine ingestion (3–10 mg/kg 60 min before exercise) should be standardized before RFD assessments.
RFD, sport science, Institute for Health and Sport, Performance-Enhancing Substances, Exercise Therapy, resistance exercise, Caffeine, Humans, rate of force development, Exercise, 4207 Sports science and exercise, caffeine, Sports
RFD, sport science, Institute for Health and Sport, Performance-Enhancing Substances, Exercise Therapy, resistance exercise, Caffeine, Humans, rate of force development, Exercise, 4207 Sports science and exercise, caffeine, Sports
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 22 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
